Facebook
Twitter
Google+
https://storywarrant.com/2021/03/24/9th-circuit-court-rules-you-dont-have-the-right-to-carry-openly-or-concealed-in-public">
RSS

Like what you're reading? Please Support Us!

9th Circuit Court Rules: You Don’t Have the Right to Carry Openly or Concealed In Public

The following article, 9th Circuit Court Rules: You Don’t Have the Right to Carry Openly or Concealed In Public, was first published on Flag And Cross.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals might have used language that said it is unconstitutional to carry a firearm openly or concealed in public, but what they’re really saying is that you shouldn’t be allowed to defend yourself and your family.

Period.

Don’t these leftists claim to care about women? How does this ruling help women in any way, whatsoever?

LOOK:

More from Daily Caller:

The 7-4 decision said restrictions on carrying guns in public do not fall within the scope of what is protected by the Second Amendment.

“The government may regulate, and even prohibit, in public places – including government buildings, churches, schools, and markets – the open carrying of small arms capable of being concealed, whether they are carried concealed or openly,” Judge Jay Bybee wrote for the majority.

It’s a liberal’s world, man. We’re just living in it.

Continue reading: 9th Circuit Court Rules: You Don’t Have the Right to Carry Openly or Concealed In Public ...

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
4 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
RegTStevonGerald LaddRockyMtn 1776 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
RockyMtn 1776
Guest
RockyMtn 1776

The nutty 9th strikes again. What part of “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do our elected officials not understand?

Gerald Ladd
Guest

I guess they don’t own a copy of the constitution either.

RegT
Guest
RegT

They do, but it is rolled up and used like Charmin.

Stevon
Guest

That’s what they say, not what the Constitution says!

RegT
Guest
RegT

These judges obviously haven’t a clue about Unintended Consequences.
They may discover – to their detriment – that they simply didn’t factor in such consequences.

Like what you're reading? Please Support Us!