The following article, Dem Senator At Big Tech Hearings: Why Isn’t Social Media Censoring More Content?, was first published on Flag And Cross.
If liberals get their way, every conservative outlet will be banned very soon. Heck, they nearly succeeded after Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016. Keyword: nearly.
Now, though, it couldn’t be more evident that Democrats want the First Amendment completely shredded.
At Wednesday afternoon’s hearing on Big Tech censorship, specifically regarding the Hunter Biden story from the New York Post, far-left Senator Ed Markey (MA) wanted to know why social media giants aren’t censoring even more.
Sen. Ed Markey at tech hearing says: "The issue is not that the companies before us today is that they're taking too many posts down. The issue is that they're leaving too many dangerous posts up." https://t.co/4au67uIp3P pic.twitter.com/HWRPRn2hHA
— Caleb Howe (@CalebHowe) October 28, 2020
Why allow supporters of the president to share their thoughts on election night when you can just silence them, ensuring the only news being read comes from a liberal perspective?
That’s how leftists think. It’s evil.
From The Hill:
The editorial board of The New York Times is imploring the world’s leading social media and technology companies to prepare themselves for a scenario in which President Trump claims victory on election night before he has been officially declared the winner.
“Imagine: It’s midnight, and the electoral map looks quite red. But news networks and election officials aren’t calling the swing states, as this year’s record numbers of mail-in and absentee ballots have yet to be fully counted,” the Times wrote in an editorial published Sunday.
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) September 29, 2020
Continue reading: Dem Senator At Big Tech Hearings: Why Isn’t Social Media Censoring More Content? ...