The following article, San Francisco Is Only Allowing ‘One Congregant’ At A Time In Any Place of Worship, DOJ Responds, was first published on Flag And Cross.
Liberals really hate them some organized religion, unless it’s Islam (obviously) – they have to remain politically correct, of course. But to only allow one person inside a church at any given time, no matter the size of the establishment, is clearly an infringement on religious freedom.
Is it not?
The DOJ thinks it is.
From The Daily Wire:
The Department of Justice sent a letter to the city of San Francisco on Friday warning them that their “one congregant” policy, under which only one member of the public is allowed in a place of worship at a time, regardless of the size of the building, was raising questions about the right to exercise religious freedoms in the city.
“San Francisco’s treatment of places of worship raises serious concerns about religious freedom,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband and U.S. Attorney David Anderson in the letter. “In particular, the limitation of indoor worship to one congregant without regard to the size of the place of worship is draconian, out of step with the treatment afforded other similar indoor activities in San Francisco, wholly at odds with this Nation’s traditional understanding of religious liberty, and may violate the First Amendment to the Constitution.”
Here’s the kicker, proving San Francisco isn’t a fan of religion…
To bolster its claim that San Francisco appears to be discriminating against people of faith, the department pointed to the fact that gyms are allowed to be open at 10% capacity indoors, and many retail stores are allowed to open at 50% capacity.
The best thing about liberals is that they are always good for a laugh. The sad part is that 11 times out of 10 they don’t know they’re the butt of the joke.
What San Franciso did in the name of “liberal activism,” if you will, is not only hilarious and ridiculous but downright absurd.
San Francisco has introduced new sanitized language for criminals, getting rid of words such as “offender” and “addict” while changing “convicted felon” to “justice-involved person.” The goal is to change people's views about those who commit crimes. https://t.co/1H30oimlXY
— FOX 11 Los Angeles (@FOXLA) August 22, 2019
San Francisco, you’re entitled to stealing money from residents of your city via taxes but you’re not entitled to your own facts.
And homeless people pooping in the streets are “urban expressionists”
— Tim Karp (@KarpFire) August 22, 2019
Yes, let's just ignore:
• brutal tax rates
• median rent of $3,720/mo
• human feces on the street
• free syringes to shoot heroin
Because, clearly San Francisco's most pressing issue is not hurting the feelings of convicted violent criminals. https://t.co/Ptl5Pn9E8h
— Adrian Norman (@AdrianNormanDC) August 22, 2019
The first rule of Crime Club is we don't talk about Crime Club. pic.twitter.com/8n2SKJCTOJ
— Mike Partyka (@MichaelJPartyka) August 22, 2019
The laughing stock of America.
— Hidden Truths (@HiddenTruths22) August 22, 2019